Glaspell Jury Of Her Peers

Advertisement

Jury of Her Peers is a powerful one-act play written by Susan Glaspell in 1916. It explores themes of gender roles, justice, and the moral dilemmas faced by women in a patriarchal society. Set in rural America, the play is based on a real-life murder case that Glaspell reported while working as a young journalist. By examining the lives of women and their experiences, Glaspell crafts a narrative that challenges societal norms and the legal system's failure to understand women's perspectives. This article delves into the key themes, characters, and the historical context of "Jury of Her Peers," illustrating how the play remains relevant in discussions about gender and justice today.

Historical Context



"Jury of Her Peers" was written during a time when women's rights were gaining momentum in the United States. The early 20th century saw women advocating for suffrage, property rights, and greater independence. This backdrop is crucial for understanding the play's exploration of gender dynamics and social justice.

- Suffrage Movement: The women’s suffrage movement was at its peak, with activists like Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton leading the charge for women’s right to vote.
- Patriarchal Society: The play reflects the deeply ingrained patriarchal values of the time, where women were often relegated to domestic roles and their contributions undervalued.
- Legal System: The legal system was predominantly male-dominated, often failing to comprehend or value women's experiences and perspectives.

Plot Summary



The play opens in a rural farmhouse where the sheriff, the county attorney, and a few local men are investigating the murder of John Wright, a man found dead in his home. The primary suspect is his wife, Minnie Wright, who is in custody. While the men search for evidence to build their case, they dismiss the concerns and insights of the women accompanying them, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters.

As the men overlook the domestic space, the women begin to piece together clues that reveal Minnie's life and the circumstances leading to the murder. The play unfolds through their conversations, highlighting the stark contrast between the men’s approach to justice and the women’s understanding of Minnie's plight.

Key Characters



1. Minnie Wright: The accused woman whose life is explored through the eyes of the other characters. Once a lively young woman, she becomes a victim of her oppressive marriage to John Wright.
2. Mrs. Hale: A farmer's wife who feels guilty for not visiting Minnie more often. She empathizes with Minnie and represents the voice of women who understand the struggles of domestic life.
3. Mrs. Peters: The sheriff's wife, who initially aligns with the men but gradually understands the severity of Minnie's situation. Her character illustrates the internal conflict between societal expectations and personal beliefs.
4. Sheriff: The local lawman who embodies the authoritative male perspective. He undermines the women and is oblivious to the emotional depth of the domestic sphere.
5. County Attorney: He represents the legal system and its failure to grasp the nuances of women's experiences.

Major Themes



"Jury of Her Peers" delves into several significant themes that resonate with contemporary audiences.

Gender Roles



The play critiques the traditional gender roles that confine women to the domestic sphere. The men in the play are dismissive of the women's insights, believing that their concerns are trivial. This attitude highlights the societal belief that women's experiences are less valid than those of men.

- Domestic Space: The women’s understanding of the domestic space allows them to uncover the underlying motivations behind Minnie’s actions. This knowledge is dismissed by the men, who focus solely on physical evidence.
- Female Solidarity: Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters develop a bond as they share their understanding of Minnie’s plight. Their solidarity symbolizes the power of women coming together to support one another against patriarchal oppression.

Justice and Morality



The play raises questions about the nature of justice and the moral implications of the characters' decisions. While the men seek to find evidence to convict Minnie, the women grapple with the ethical dilemmas of their loyalty to one another.

- Legal vs. Moral Justice: The men focus on legal justice, which lacks an understanding of the emotional and psychological dimensions of the crime. The women, however, consider the moral implications of Minnie's actions, leading them to ultimately protect her.
- Empathy and Understanding: The women’s ability to empathize with Minnie allows them to see the complexities of her situation, contrasting sharply with the men’s rigid adherence to the law.

Symbolism



Glaspell employs various symbols throughout the play to deepen its themes and messages.

The Birdcage



The dead canary found by the women symbolizes Minnie's lost freedom and happiness. It represents her life before marriage, filled with music and joy, which was stifled by her controlling husband.

- Freedom vs. Confinement: The canary’s death parallels Minnie’s emotional state; it signifies her ultimate break from a life of oppression.
- Rebellion: The act of killing her husband can be seen as a desperate form of rebellion against years of abuse and isolation.

The Quilt



The unfinished quilt serves as a metaphor for the lives of women, representing their roles in society and the unfinished nature of their stories.

- Craftsmanship: The women’s attention to the quilt reflects their understanding of the complexity of women’s lives, which cannot be easily judged or simplified.
- Collaboration: The act of quilting symbolizes community and the shared experiences of women, highlighting the importance of female relationships in navigating societal challenges.

Conclusion



Susan Glaspell's "Jury of Her Peers" remains a poignant exploration of gender roles, justice, and moral complexity. The play’s emphasis on women’s experiences challenges the audience to reconsider the limitations of traditional legal systems in understanding human behavior and emotional truths. By highlighting the bond between women and their capacity for empathy, Glaspell advocates for a broader understanding of justice that includes the voices and experiences of those often marginalized in society.

As contemporary discussions about gender equality, domestic violence, and the justice system continue to evolve, "Jury of Her Peers" serves as a timeless reminder of the importance of listening to women's stories. The play encourages audiences to reflect on the moral implications of their decisions and the necessity of empathy in the pursuit of justice. Through its rich symbolism and complex characters, Glaspell’s work remains a vital part of both feminist literature and American theater.

Frequently Asked Questions


What are the main themes explored in Susan Glaspell's 'A Jury of Her Peers'?

The main themes include gender roles, the nature of justice, and the oppression of women. The story highlights how women's experiences and perspectives are often dismissed in a male-dominated society.

How does Glaspell use symbolism in 'A Jury of Her Peers'?

Glaspell uses several symbols, such as the broken birdcage and the dead canary, to represent the main character's lost freedom and happiness. These symbols illustrate the emotional and psychological abuse faced by women.

What role do the female characters play in 'A Jury of Her Peers'?

The female characters, particularly Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, serve as a counterpoint to the male characters. They bond over shared experiences and ultimately empathize with the accused woman, deciding to protect her by concealing evidence.

How does the setting influence the narrative of 'A Jury of Her Peers'?

The rural, isolated farmhouse setting reflects the themes of confinement and domesticity. It emphasizes the limitations placed on women and the small, intimate world they inhabit, which contrasts with the broader societal issues.

What is the significance of the title 'A Jury of Her Peers'?

The title signifies the idea of empathy and understanding among women. It suggests that the female characters, though not an official jury, represent a moral and emotional judgment that recognizes the shared experiences of women.